Reaching For The Moon

6.91 h 54 min201313+
Set in 1950s Brazil, this sumptuous drama recounts Pulitzer Prize-winning poet Elizabeth Bishop (Miranda Otto, "Lord of the Rings") and her love affair with famed architect Lota de Macedo Soares. From Oscar-nominated Brazilian director Bruno Barreto ("Four Days in September"), "Reaching for the Moon" is an intimate snapshot of the search for inspiration, wherever and however you find it.
Bruno Barreto
Miranda OttoGlória Pires
English [CC]
Audio languages
Rentals include 30 days to start watching this video and 48 hours to finish once started.

Watch for $0.00 with Prime

Add to Watchlist
Add to
By ordering or viewing, you agree to our Terms. Sold by Services LLC.
Write review

More details

Lucy BarretoPaula Barreto
Wolfe Video
Content advisory
Violencealcohol usesmokingfoul languagesexual content
Purchase rights
Stream instantly Details
Prime Video (streaming online video)
Available to watch on supported devices

Other formats


4.4 out of 5 stars

309 global ratings

  1. 72% of reviews have 5 stars
  2. 10% of reviews have 4 stars
  3. 6% of reviews have 3 stars
  4. 5% of reviews have 2 stars
  5. 7% of reviews have 1 stars
Sorted by:

Top reviews from the United States

SaguaroGeorgeReviewed in the United States on May 29, 2020
3.0 out of 5 stars
The rich at play but sad, and you will be too
Verified purchase
Like so many modern films (and novels, but I am reviewing a film), sex can be shown in any desired permutation and combination – here a lesbian ménage à trois – but any discussion of money is taboo. The American, the poet Elizabeth Bishop, appears to have no money worries – she stops off in Brazil during a round-the-world trip, while the Brazilian disports vast wealth. What is the source of all this money? Never mentioned. Yet notwithstanding a lifestyle which 99.99% of humanity would envy, these three ladies contrive to be unhappy, often desperately so. Of course their sadness, which permeates the film, makes us sad. So, if you fancy watching a lesbian trio prove that no ménage à trois can be happy, no matter how buttressed with endless piles of money, have at it. By the way, there is very little actual sex in this film, really not nearly enough given the theme; except for a few words spoken in anger, this movie could be rated PG.
6 people found this helpful
nickel platedReviewed in the United States on November 28, 2021
5.0 out of 5 stars
Verified purchase
What is the saddest thing in life? Could it be to find love and to lose it again? I think so. This is a beautifully crafted story. The cinematography is excellent, the dialogue meaningful, the acting so unlike acting that it seemed to me they were living their parts rather than portraying them. How could anyone review this story based on the sexuality of the main characters when the real story is the complications of love and loss and jealousy? This is not primarily about lesbianism, this is a story primarily about love, and love has no boundaries. We love whom we love, period!

One of the most fascinating, heartbreaking, yet brilliantly done stories I have watched. Bravo!!
3 people found this helpful
AmadeusReviewed in the United States on September 26, 2022
5.0 out of 5 stars
Poise and love in Rio de Janeiro
Verified purchase
It’s beautifully acted and even more gorgeously made movie about American poet - pale creature that left New York to escape and found richness and love in Rio de Janeiro. It’s filled with nature, flowers, bold women - the one that brittle and the one that strong; and than they switched. It’s filled with poetry and architecture - the fields where male egos run supreme, but all we can see are gorgeous and driven females woven into each other. It was very captivating - you feel sorry that so few artistic endeavors can deal with complicated matters of love, politics, class and fate with grace of this movie. (Or I forgot the gender and sexuality within same one).
One person found this helpful
Muriel VasconcellosReviewed in the United States on June 7, 2015
3.0 out of 5 stars
Two brilliant women - ahead of their time
Verified purchase
I had hoped for more from this movie, considering its pedigree: director Bruno Barreto (View from the Top, Four Days in September, Dona Flor and Her Two Husbands); the excellent cast, including Miranda Otto (Lord of the Rings); and the compelling true story that it's based on. I read the book "Rare and Commonplace Flowers" in 2005, and my late Brazilian husband, architect Sylvio de Vasconcellos, knew all the main characters personally, so maybe I was expecting more content than could possibly be squeezed into a 2-hour film.
For those who aren't familiar with the story, American poet Elizabeth Bishop arrives in Rio de Janeiro on a freighter in 1951. She has a ticket to travel around the world and is taking advantage of the stopover in Rio to see her friend from Vassar, Mary Morse. Bishop is 40 years old and already well known for her poetry, having recently completed a stint at the Library of Congress in the position that was later to be called "Poet Laureate."
A self-declared lesbian with a string of lovers in her past, she soon discovers that Mary is living with Lota de Soares Macedo at a beautiful inland retreat not far from Rio. The scenery is breathtaking - and how could it not be? The views of the Brazilian landscape are worth the price of admission.
Hours after her arrival, Bishop bites into a caju fruit (the fruit that bears the cashew nut at its tip) and has a violent allergic reaction that nearly takes her life. She misses her boat and ends up remaining in Brazil for 15 years in a ménage à trois with Lota and Mary. It's worth noting that Bishop gets by on a fairly decent inheritance from her family and Lota is in similar circumstances, only much wealthier. This is a story about rich people who have a lot of time on their hands.
Otto's interpretation of Bishop is delicately nuanced; she does a masterful job of capturing the poet's moods and quirks. Glória Pires is powerful as Lota. From the old photos online, it would appear that they each bear a strong resemblance to the real person they are portraying. Yet somehow I didn't feel the chemistry between them, or with Mary. While the compulsive attraction between and among them is key to the story, it just didn't work for me. Also, I didn't feel the characters age, or the tensions deepen, over or the evolution of the 15-year relationship. Lota ultimately has a nervous breakdown, which is blamed on Bishop. We see her go straight from commander-in-chief of an enormous landfill project (creation of Rio's famous Flamengo Park) to a pathetic shadow in a mental hospital. If Bishop was the cause of Lota's breakdown, as a movie-goer, I want to understand why.
On another level, I was expecting credit where credit was due in the creation of Flamengo Park. Lota is billed as its creator and "architect," but the park was famously designed by architect Affonso Eduardo Reidy and landscape architect Roberto Burle Marx.* Lota had no formal training in architecture. Furthermore, the house where she lived, which in the movie she claims she designed herself, was in fact designed by architect Sérgio Bernardes. He won a prize for it in 1953 at the II São Paulo Bienal.**
Still, if you want a movie that takes place in a beautiful setting and celebrates the accomplishments of two very strong, very independent women who broke the cultural mold of their time, you will be rewarded.
* For the story of my acquaintance with Burle Marx, see
** For the true story of Flamengo Park and Lota's house, see
27 people found this helpful
C HensleyReviewed in the United States on September 5, 2016
2.0 out of 5 stars
Disappointing and dull
Verified purchase
Before viewing the film I watched the DVD interviews with the main characters. One of the questions asked was "How did you prepare for your role?" The lead actress - Gloria Pires - said she did a role-reversal with a male actor. He played the woman and she played the man. I was perplexed by that response. After watching 3/4 of this movie I turned it off. The scenery was visually stunning. That was the best part. As for the two female leads, their chemistry was close to zero. But no wonder ... one of them was playing a man. This movie is not a lesbian love story A woman playing a man is not a lesbian; it is a woman playing a man. I was very disappointed with this film. I think it would have been a far better movie had the lead spent some time in conversation with a lesbian in love. That might have better prepared her for her role as a woman in love with another woman.
12 people found this helpful
m GaryReviewed in the United States on June 5, 2021
1.0 out of 5 stars
Disjointed, doesn’t make sense
Verified purchase
This movie jumped all over the place and assumed that the audience already knew the main characters life stories and the history and politics of Brazil. If you don’t know all of that then it makes no sense because they skip from one scene to the next with no connections or explanation. Also, these two women may have produced brilliant works but this movie made me hate them. It portrays them as privileged, selfish, and mean. Also one of them is a “drunk”. That is their word not mine.
2 people found this helpful
KGReviewed in the United States on December 22, 2013
5.0 out of 5 stars
A deeply moving, under-seen little gem
Verified purchase
I was sad to see this deeply moving, complex and intelligent story of the love between the award winning American poet Elizabeth Bishop and Brazilian architect Lota de Macedo Soares. so overlooked by U.S. audiences and critics. There are two outstanding performances by Miranda Otto as the outwardly shy and repressed alcoholic Bishop, and Gloria Pires as her opposite, an extroverted, highly emotional woman who coaxes Bishop out of her shell.

Very nicely photographed, this reminded me of the best of the Merchant-Ivory films. It's not flashy. Indeed there's a quiet to it
that is needed to off-set the melodramatic (even if based in truths) elements of these women's lives. But that doesn't keep it from packing a hell of an emotional punch, and in being bold enough to create characters we care for, but who are also deeply troubled and capable of making bad choices – just like in the real world of relationships we rarely see on screen.

It was also nice to see a gay love story that both acknowledged how difficult being homosexual was in the 1950s, while not becoming a film about that only. This is a film about a complex relationship between two highly creative and wounded souls who
both save and damage each other. The fact that both are women is only a small part of the larger story. It's also one of the only films I've seen capture at least a taste of the struggle and loneliness of the act of writing.

One of those quiet little gems that deserves to be discovered by more people.
62 people found this helpful
DanyReviewed in the United States on March 23, 2014
5.0 out of 5 stars
Pleasant Surprise
Verified purchase
After you have watched as many gay films as I have you get use to the same old thing. Bad plots with good acting, good plots with bad acting, bad plots with bad acting. Pick one and you will have it in most lesbian films. This one really was a great surprise. I took the previous reviews with a grain of salt but I have to agree with the majority.

Excellent movie based on real people. Enjoyed the Brazil scenery and going through the journey with the two women. A good love story that happens to involve two women. Excellent acting. Love scenes were not over done.

Rent it or buy it. Either way you will not go wrong.
31 people found this helpful
See all reviews