Top critical review
Not Made on this Earth
Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on March 23, 2019
As always Greer & Salla don’t have inkling about the science: And just like Tompkins, Corey Good, David Wilcock plus many others tries to use the Biefeld-Brown effect for Space Flight when it's been known for years it's a dead end.
As Puthoff said in a message dated 7/1/2017 3:10:45 P.M. Central Daylight: 'True for the Biefeld-Brown Effect - TT Brown said it was a dead end for space propulsion. The term Electrogravitics can have a broader meaning, so I wouldn't put that in the same category'...Hal
Where are all those super advanced Spaceships that Corey Good and Bill Tompkins talk about? Who needs billion dollar Orion Rocket Programs if we have all those operational Star Ships in a Secret Space Program?
Corey Goode and David Wilcock are used as primary sources throughout the book, “Antarctica's Hidden History: Corporate Foundations of Secret Space Programs.” More 4th Reich fantasies.
All those drawings are/were proposals, not real life projects or anti-gravity machines. Yet, according to Tompkins and Goode we have all those Star Ships flying around. We did have real life Paperclip German Scientists working on reverse engineering but as the LANL source said they didn't go anywhere, see comment section.
The Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) runs Area 51. Two major players are the Air Force and Navy with NSA and other government agencies in a minor role. Aeronautical Systems Center (ASC) runs all the Air Force's Black Programs at Wight-Patterson AFB, LANL and Area51 to include Aurora (Hypersonic Aircraft): The classified ASC Aurora SPO office was verified by WP Civil Engineering in the late nineties.
Not Made on this Earth:
After asking a series of questions, Charles (LANL source) then responded on January 4th, 2004:
“Before answering your questions, you are assuming that ET crafts are made with our technology based on your questions. Many years ago, we made that same mistake and it took us several years to correct the mistake and start fresh from the drawing board.
"Their technology is nothing similar to ours. We do not utilize our physics or chemistry in a comparison analysis. We started from scratch and learned their principles of dynamics, physics, etc.
"The document (Chap 3, Figure 1, Exempt from Disclosure, see comment section) I gave my contact was a briefing to people with some basic knowledge of the craft. I used our grammar and basic English comparison phrases to explain a very complex ET system.
"The ET craft was manufactured using ET technology. This craft was built many years before we developed flight. They used a different physics principle that we still don’t fully understand. We cannot duplicate the craft’s material. We have nothing similar to that material on Earth. We have similar substances, metals, etc, but 80% of the craft’s outer shell is made of an unknown type of material that we do not have on Earth. Some of it is made from a substance similar to Zinc but with a different atomic weight and valence.
"The primary propulsion system is electro-magnetic flux directional positive force generating system (not the Biefeld-Brown effect, Hal Puthoff, Earthtech, Austin, Texas will tell us that: see comment section). The secondary propulsion system is an anti-gravity (using fluid plasma) directional negative force generating system. Remember, these are our terms: comment; see Alcubierre Warp Drive in comment section.
"The entire craft can be a super conductor or a super capacitor depending on how the propulsion system is configured. Like I said, the system is extremely complicated. Unless you understand the entire system, which we don’t, you won’t understand what I am saying.
"The electrical system works on a vacuum vacated energy principle. This system generates an unlimited amount of power. The Visitors have determined that hydrogen has many more isotopes than we thought. H5 is one isotope they harness and use as a catalyst inside the power device.
"Getting to your questions, it would do you no good for me to answer those questions. You would be completely baffled by my answers. It is best to let the questions sit until the completed information is made public.
"I directed no disrespect to your regarding the “dumb friends” statement. I simply meant people without the inside knowledge makes statements that are dumb. I’ve worked on this project for 12 years and I sometimes call myself dumb because I try to compare the craft with our technology. Doing that is dumb, as all who have worked on the craft over the years have come to understand.”
Charles, LANL contact
So, we are still very much in the R & D phase having to start all over again. See footnotes: